Sleepy Hollow
The film Sleepy Hollow by Tim Burton takes the
original short story, “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow,” by Washington Irving and
puts a new spin to it, well, a few spins to it. I like both versions of the
story of Ichabod and the headless horseman. I think Burton takes the elements
of the story individually and creates a whole new story with those elements. He
takes the character of Ichabod Crane and gives him a back story that we do not
get in the story, which I like. By changing that Ichabod’s mother was a witch
and that she died before his eyes, it created a whole new story for that
character. In the story we assume that Ichabod had a normal childhood
considering there is no special attention given to it in the story. He creates
a Batman-like character by adding the element of Ichabod’s mother dying before
his eyes in his vivid dreams of his mother. After that he clings to science and
technology. There has to be a logical explanation for everything, and there is
a reason behind everything. Those are two philosophies of the two characters:
Batman and Ichabod. They are both absent of greed, which is unlike the
character of Ichabod from the short story, because they know what greed does to
the soul.
In the short
story, it is not stated directly if Ichabod was in fact chased by the headless
horseman, and whether or not the horseman even exists, which I like. But I like
Burton’s version of this legend better. He made the horseman real, but he is
controlled by someone else, a soul greedy for vengeance. I like how Burton
incorporated Irving’s original idea of the greedy soul in the villain, giving
the horseman a greedy soul also. The themes of the short story are still there,
just in different ways. Both stories have a happy ending, in which the unclean
soul is expelled and the people of Sleepy Hollow live on in peace. I do not think
Burton just uses the character names to enhance a horror story because the themes
of story are still there, just in a different way that, I think, is more accessible
to film. If Burton would have kept the original plot the movie would not be as
enjoyable I think because I feel the main character is flat. He does not seem to
change in the story whereas in the film he leaves Sleepy Hollow with a new
outlook on the supernatural and love seeing as he falls in love with the
beautiful Katrina Van Tassel, and not for her money.
|
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
Dupuis: Sleepy Hollow
Labels:
adaptations,
Amy Dupuis,
Burton,
Irving,
Sleepy Hollow
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I really like that you said that Washington Irving’s Ichabod Crane was “flat”. I really felt the same way about him too. I felt that he did not have much dimension or personality outside of his greediness and superstitiousness. Also the atmosphere of the film was a lot darker than in the short story which, of course, is classic Burton. I really liked the added darkness because it also added depth that leaves the viewers in suspense. The unknown of the wilderness is something that this reflective of both stories and Burton’s take on it shows how much the people really did fear nature. The emotional distance they feel towards nature contrasts how close nature actually is to them and by that I think Burton is saying that space is relative. The incorporation of witchcraft is a really cool element too and what I found most funny is that Burton’s Ichabod, upon discovering the pentagram Katrina drew on the church floor at the end of the movie, realizes that it’s a symbol of protection and she was really just trying to protect him and her father. Burton might also be trying to say there that what we may perceive as evil may not necessarily be upon closer examination.
ReplyDelete-Tara Malay